Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- public:ministries:nomcom [2024/10/17 14:56] – [Nominating Committee] Steve Mundall
+++ public:ministries:nomcom [2024/11/01 21:50] (current) – [Introduction] Steve Mundall
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
-**This document serves to reveal some changes that occured through the years regarding the organization of the Nominating Committee as documented in the Church Manual from 1932 to 2022. **
+**This document was the result of a study to understand conflicting information from various sources about the makup of the nominating committee and the role of the pastor. It serves to answer that question by revealing some changes that occured through the years regarding the organization of the Nominating Committee as documented in the Church Manual from 1932 to 2022. **
 ----
+**PREFACE**
-We will begin with a snapshot recorded by J.N. Loughborough in [[https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/1119.740#740 | The Church: Its Organization, Order and Discipline]] which was introduced by James White in the [[https://documents.adventistarchives.org/Periodicals/RH/RH18611015-V18-20.pdf | Review. Oct 15, 1861]]. This rendition has further modifications and is taken from the [[ https://documents.adventistarchives.org/Periodicals/RH/RH18771129-V50-22.pdf | Nov. 29, 1977 Review]].
+We will begin with an early snapshot of the proccess as recorded by J.N. Loughborough in [[https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/1119.740#740 | The Church: Its Organization, Order and Discipline]] which was introduced by James White in the [[https://documents.adventistarchives.org/Periodicals/RH/RH18611015-V18-20.pdf | Review. Oct 15, 1861]]. The rendition below has further modifications and is taken from the [[ https://documents.adventistarchives.org/Periodicals/RH/RH18771129-V50-22.pdf | Nov. 29, 1877 Review]]. (Not all of the print is readable and missing words are replaced with an underline)
@@ Line 23: / Line 24: @@
 ----
-It should be noted that the church in General Conference voted several times //__against__// adopting any such official manual, and it wasn't until after the death of E.G.W. and others, and after much backsliding that the church manual was first officially adopted.
+It should be noted that the document produced by Loughborough and the efforts of others, while printed in the RH, were never officially adopted by the church even if the methods may have been generally practiced. In fact, the church in General Conference voted several times //__against__// adopting any such official manual, and it wasn't until after the death of E.G.W. and others who opposed such a manual, and after much backsliding that the church manual was first officially adopted.
@@ Line 33: / Line 34: @@
 (Taken from 20th Edition, Revised 2022)
-The opening sentence of the preface of that first edition [1932] observed that “it has become increasingly evident that a manual on church government is needed to set forth and preserve our denominational practices and polity.” Note the word //**<color #ed1c24>preserve</color>**//  . This was no attempt to suddenly create and impose upon the Church a whole pattern of church governance. Rather it was an endeavor first to //preserve// all the good actions taken through the years and then to add rules required by the Church’s increasing growth and complexity.
+"The opening sentence of the preface of that first edition [1932] observed that “it has become increasingly evident that a manual on church government is needed to set forth and preserve our denominational practices and polity.”
+Note the word //**<color #ed1c24>preserve</color>**//  . This was no attempt to suddenly create and impose upon the Church a whole pattern of church governance. Rather it was an endeavor first to //preserve// all the good actions taken through the years and then to add rules required by the Church’s increasing growth and complexity."
+**NOTE:** it is ironic that this act of preservation is highlighted as late as the 2022 edition, when edits to the manual have now resulted in some conditions that are opposite the original text.
 ----